Some missed occasion & legitimate question to 'Incumbent', "?"

Image result for legitimateIn the bygone Loksabha election, or since a year ago or for the whole 5 years of Narendra Modi, what lacked in his opponents and either way supporter of his opponents was to ask legitimate questions. And very sadly they are still continuing on that path. When it comes to ''either way supporter of Modi's opponent''(EWSMO), it is referred to news portal like The Wire, Scroll, Media Vigil, Dalit Dastak....., personalty like Prashant Bhushan, Arun Shourie, Yashwant Sinha, Abhishar Sharma, Pronoy Roy, Rawish, Dhruv Rathee, Aakash Bannrejee, Kunal Kamra, Kanahiya Kumar, Sahela Rashid... and a fixed religio-secular people who are in fact pseudo one.

Although the duty to ask the question from authority is only synchronous to common people, but not their sole responsibility. Common people can coincide and raise echo with these either way opponent, only when they will find them convincing. For instance, when NAUKRI(Job) Series was done by Rawish Kumar and before that he did UNIVERSITY Series, both were well accepted across the spectrum. A serious discussion on the job was going on, and Modi gave them an easy tilt by adjoining PAKAUDA with a job opportunity and the whole of EWSMO started making a joke and turned a serious debate into satire only. On one go during the launch of his book 'the free voice', he asserted on, not to make jokes while criticizing Modi. It was an advice from a satirist-cum-journalist Rawish Kumar. But every time Modi gave a topic to EWSMO to make a joke and these poor fools got happy with that. In this course, they either forget to ask a legitimate question or they had not have such capacity anymore.

In a moment, when NDA has nearly wiped out its opponent, even more gracefully than 2014. it is also evident that no one could have stopped NDA from retaining power at-least with a simple majority. But it is also a seemingly loaded argument that if these EWSMO had have asked a legitimate question and acted rightfully than it would have been hard to cross 272 for BJP because apart from state and center level anti-incumbency BJP contested less number of seats than 2014.

Here is an 'incomplete' list with explanation of some legitimate questions and supposed act, which were not asked and done respectively by EWSMO, rather they keep asking illegitimate question and acted rudely to malign BJP, Modi and many a time India.

1. RAFALE
Scam regarding Rafale was a full perception game, where EWSMO and principal opponent were on the same page. It was somehow same as the Coffin Scam during Vajpayee tenure, but the main difference between these two was, former was a tactic and based on false perception, while later was based on a report by CAG. Despite that EWSMO was able to cash it in Rajasthan, Chattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh. But EWSMO's act was all set to fail Rahul Gandhi, because Prashant Bhushan and team had gone to court on this issue, it was only Supreme Court which saved Rahul Gandhi by not giving early judgment. The judgment came only after the Vidhan Sabha poll result, but retardation on opponents support base started.

So, if these EWSMO had not gone to court and made the usual perception of scam in Rafale deal, it would have been a turned around.

2. National Security
Here, EWSMO is mistaken deliberately. They asked proof for the surgical strike and Modi's opponents followed them. Eventually, the government and army provided proofs every now and then. A common neutral public does not seek for such proofs, they felt that Modi has unturned most of the rocks in terms of national security.

Since EWSMO has more concern about condemning BJP than Army and other security personnel. So, on one hand, they asked why were CRPF personnel not transferred by air when Pulwama happened, while they did not get into a rage when AN-32 was missed in July in 2016. Again the former was an illegitimate question because these no-mind species can't think, if security personnel would be transferred by air only, the land of J&k would be governed by whom? That would be EWSMO's allies terrorist and separatists.

So, if they had managed to raise the similar rage when AN-32 was missed as they managed when Asifa(Kathua) happened, it had surely dented the Modi's perception in public mind in terms of Nat-security.

3. Demonetization
A common man of India has been habitual of standing in queue for a long time, demonetization was once more. So, no legitimate question can be raised except taking the view of it's more effective implementation. But EWSMO put their all effort to a data released by RBI in its annual report. Every time EWSMO tried their best to cash it, but people loved NaMo Even After DeMo.

4. Job Creation
Every question finds legitimacy if it is asked about job creation. EWSMO put their best foot forward when Rawish Kumar did Job Series in prime-time, and things were moved ahead. But poor EWSMO took their head at Modi's PAKAUDA  statement and seriousness was wiped out.

Still, on job creation, they asked many illegitimate questions too..!! They asked for the account of 2 crores jobs annually as alleged that Modi had promised. But neither Modi nor BJP in its manifesto ever promised 2 crore job.

5. Bad Fielding and Placement
EWSMO pulls their severe effort into Kanhaiya Kumar of Begusarai in the preview of his mass appeal. EWSMO has invested its mobile data and airtime on him. But their effort made Kanhaiya limited to Begusarai, and Communist Party also had not any alliance other than Communists itself, Kanhaiya was not drowned to election rallies of other parties. Other personas in EWSMO have not that appeal. For that appeal, they should put Rawish Kumar as a scriptwriter. But that moron has miss-leaded his own members of EWSMO.

It would be said that EWSMO regularly erupted with those question which was not convincing to themselves, but they had no other option because BJP had not left any. So, they fused over 15 lakh promise, they try to malign Modi over his statement on the environment, which was actually a trimmed video. Basically, every now and then they mock-n-mock, and ironically enough for this, they hired a professional comedian to lead them, Kunal Kamra.

But what about development??

6. Development 
For common people development is an abstract, a feeling. So, every time when common people were asked,'' where is the development?'', they hardly replied with Swachh Bharat, Beti Bachao..., and some more. And EWSMO hoped for some UPSC's candidates answer, where they should be equipped with schemes, status, and data. By NAMO APP, Modi tried to equip them with such facts but mostly failed. Not many voters were able to make counts of such facts, and it was also obvious because even a UPSC candidate has to revise these facts for answering. So 'blind' EWSMO was not able to see development because a 'blind' should not forget to feel things rather than trying to see at the first place.

Last and least, since neither the political opponent nor EWSMO has changed yet. They are continuing with their habit, so together with questioning these EWSMO, one should also question government but keeping in mind that those questions should be different from EWSMO because what EWSMO ask has null legitimacy. 

Comments